Legal Opinion

Doe v. Hemophilia Center of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Cross appeal unanimously dismissed, and order *854and judgment affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff, as limited administratrix of her husband’s estate and individually, commenced this action based upon decedent’s death from AIDS as a result of contaminated blood products furnished by defendant in or about 1980 to treat decedent’s hemophilia and based upon plaintiff herself having thereafter been infected with the HIV virus by her husband. She alleges five causes of action for medical malpractice, negligence and fraud.

Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion dismissing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Massie v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. MaherNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Brown v. StarkweatherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Smith v. CutsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ponterio v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Doe v. Institute for Family HealthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API