Nawas v. Holmes
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES, Justice.
This is a suit on a note by the payee against the maker. The central question before us is whether there was a conditional delivery of the note by the maker to the payee for a special purpose. Based upon a jury verdict, the trial court held that there was a conditional delivery for a special purpose. We affirm.
Plaintiff-Appellant Yousef S. Nawas brought this suit against Defendant-Appel-lee Richard Joseph Holmes for Holmes’s alleged failure to pay a $67,000.00 note made by Holmes individually payable to Nawas individually. Trial was had to a jury, which found:(1) That…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kuper v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Helmke v. PrasifkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Williams v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Bynum v. Peoples State Bank of TurkeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Heights Savings Association v. CordesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Labar v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Ventures, Inc. v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. LloydIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Rodney Turner v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
- State of Tennessee v. Amanda L. MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.