Legal Opinion

Nawas v. Holmes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 9, 1976No. 5581PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES, Justice.

This is a suit on a note by the payee against the maker. The central question before us is whether there was a conditional delivery of the note by the maker to the payee for a special purpose. Based upon a jury verdict, the trial court held that there was a conditional delivery for a special purpose. We affirm.

Plaintiff-Appellant Yousef S. Nawas brought this suit against Defendant-Appel-lee Richard Joseph Holmes for Holmes’s alleged failure to pay a $67,000.00 note made by Holmes individually payable to Nawas individually. Trial was had to a jury, which found:(1) That…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kuper v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Helmke v. PrasifkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Williams v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Bynum v. Peoples State Bank of TurkeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Heights Savings Association v. CordesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Labar v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Ventures, Inc. v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. LloydIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Rodney Turner v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
  5. State of Tennessee v. Amanda L. MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API