Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1993No. 17715PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Lawrence Marshall appeals his judgment of conviction for aggravated assault. We affirm.

FACTS

A grand jury indicted Lawrence for aggravated assault as a result of an incident with his wife, Elizabeth. Elizabeth, a reluctant witness, testified that Lawrence struck her three times with a piece of pipe. She testified the first blow landed on her nose and opened a wound about two inches long. A photo of the wound was admitted into evidence. She testified the second blow hit her in the back of the head and then she testified there was no third blow.

On cross-examination Elizabeth…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. TapioSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. WallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. GillespieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. PossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Border States Paving, Inc. v. South Dakota State Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GirouxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. McGarrettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. TammiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BerhanuSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. GirouxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API