Legal Opinion

Smithey v. Shambaugh

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1935No. 6527PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge HARVEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The defendant in error, Scott Shambaugh, brought this suit against the plaintiffs in error, W. W. Smithey and wife, Frances M. Smithey, and C. W. Hurley. As against Smithey and wife, a recovery on a paving certificate is sought, with foreclosure of the assessment lien on a city lot. Hurley is alleged to hold a subordinate lien on the lot. The case was tried before the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of all the defendants. Shambaugh appealed, and the Court of Civil Appeals reversed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. AtkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Scanlan v. Gulf Bitulithic Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Nalle v. EavesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. City of New London v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  5. Curtiss v. Inhabitants of SheffieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bashara v. Saratoga Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Uvalde Construction Co. v. JoinerTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Stegall v. OadraTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lindsley v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Lofstedt v. Gulf Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API