Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Atkins

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1920No. 3291PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Dallas County. Atkins and others obtained temporary injunction restraining the City of Dallas and its officers from enforcing assessments against property of plaintiffs and their personal liability for costs of widening a street, under proceedings by virtue of the charter and ordinances of the city. Defendants appealed, and on affirmance (197 S. W., 593) obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

Defendants in error obtained a temporary injunction restraining plaintiffs in error, the City of Dallas and certain of its officers, from enforcing an ordinance, under which the City sought to condemn certain property for the purpose of widening a street, and to assess the cost of the work against property specially benefited and the owners thereof. The order granting the temporary injunction was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals in an opinion containing a full statement of the case, reported in 197 S. W., at'page 593.

The principal assignments here complain that the Court of Civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. BordagesTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Storrie v. CortesTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. City of Paris v. O.N. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Conley v. Sherman, Shreveport & Southern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. City of Wichita Falls Ex Rel. L. E. Whitham & Co. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Joiner v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1974
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Scanlan v. Gulf Bitulithic Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Realty Trust Co. v. CraddockTexas Supreme Court · 1938

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API