Legal Opinion

Hague v. Delong

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1937No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 39,652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Whitlock, Smith & Company, brokers in the city of Detroit, brought suit to collect a commission from defendants for securing a customer for the purchase of their stock in the American Broach & Machine Company. They alleged in their declaration that their dealings were with Francis J. Lapointe, who, besides being a large stockholder in the American Broach & Machine Company, also represented all the other stockholders, all of whom are defendants herein and who together owned the capital stock of the company. Plaintiffs claim that they were to receive a commission upon the sale of the capital…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. GroomesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Lower v. Muskegon Heights Co-Operative DairyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Auditor General v. Bassett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Mullholland v. PatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bailey Construction Co. v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SwirlesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Hague v. DelongMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Birmingham Contracting Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
  4. Hague v. DelongMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API