Legal Opinion

Lakin v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1989No. 41A04-8804-CV-124Published

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Plaintiffappellant Charles H. Lakin, a locomotive engineer, brought an action in state court against his employer defendant-appellee Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) to recover for injuries he allegedly suffered while making an emergency exit from a locomotive which had collided with a truck at a railroad crossing in Marion County, Indiana. Lakin claimed that while exiting, he tripped over a cable lying across the floor of the locomotive and was injured. Lakin filed suit under the Federal Employer's Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (FELA), alleging Conrail was negligent.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Willard Green v. River Terminal Railway Co., Third Party Jerald E. Dawson, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API