Lakin v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
Plaintiffappellant Charles H. Lakin, a locomotive engineer, brought an action in state court against his employer defendant-appellee Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) to recover for injuries he allegedly suffered while making an emergency exit from a locomotive which had collided with a truck at a railroad crossing in Marion County, Indiana. Lakin claimed that while exiting, he tripped over a cable lying across the floor of the locomotive and was injured. Lakin filed suit under the Federal Employer's Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (FELA), alleging Conrail was negligent.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Willard Green v. River Terminal Railway Co., Third Party Jerald E. Dawson, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.