Baumet v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
The district court so interpreted the statute as to reach a result which ascribes to Congress a capricious purpose. Doubtless the court arrived reluctantly at this conclusion, for such an interpretation should be rejected unless inescapable.
On this appeal, we must assume that, were plaintiff permitted to remain in this litigation, the district court would find that certain instalments came due and were payable to Peters during his lifetime. But the district court’s interpretation would deny those payments to Peters’ estate—and give them to the father—simply because the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Helen Russell Pierce, of the Last Will and Testament of George Washington Pierce, Deceased v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Ewing v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Baumet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Baumet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Henning v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.