Legal Opinion

Rhyne v. United States Steel Corporation

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided March 24, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00197Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv-00197-RJC-DSC BRUCE RHYNE and JANICE RHYNE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES STEEL ) CORPORATION, SUNOCO, INC. (R&M), ) ORDER f/k/a Sun Company, Inc. f/k/a Sun Oil ) Company, Inc., SAFETY-KLEEN ) SYSTEMS, INC., CRC INDUSTRIES, ) INC., KANO LABORATORIES, INC., THE ) SAVOGRAN COMPANY, and TURTLE ) WAX, INC., individually and as successor ) to Marvel Oil Company, Inc., ) ) Defendants. ) THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the following defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment: Turtle Wax, Inc.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Melvin Moss v. Parks Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API