Legal Opinion

Hollyfield v. Geibel

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1934No. Civ. 5777PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Martin E. Geibel, as executor of the estate of George W. Hollyfield, deceased, has appealed from a judgment which was rendered against him in his representative capacity, foreclosing a lien upon specifically described real property, to satisfy a judgment which was rendered in another suit quieting title in this plaintiff, Susanne Holly-field, to an undivided one-fourth interest in the real property, and to the sum of $1683.52 held in the possession of this appellant.

It is contended the former judgment which determined this respondent’s title to the undivided one-fourth interest in the real…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Jordan v. Austin Securities Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Chase v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Schwarz v. BohleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Dwight Look v. Government of GuamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Cornitius v. CornitiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Busch v. TruittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API