Legal Opinion
Smith v. Department of Education
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 13, 2005No. 04-15262PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Neale E. Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint against the U.S. Department of Education, the Secretary of the Department of Education, the Arizona Board of Regents, the University of Arizona, and several individuals, alleging, inter alia, a claim under the Age Discrimination Act (“ADA”) in connection with the denial of his application for admission to graduate programs at the University of Arizona in 1998, 1999, and 2001. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- W. Michael Kimes J. Colette Boykin v. Peter G. Stone, Judge, Superior Court Robert L. Mezzetti, II Henry Mariani Robert MacHadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Christopher I. Simmons v. Sacramento County Superior Court Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and R. Duane SkeltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Scott v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ardalan v. NAU School of NursingDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Zamora v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023