People v. Ackroyd
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph Harris, J.
The instant case presents the following paradox: how, upon the same conduct, can a Grand Jury legally absolve one for a higher offense requiring a lower culpable mental state, yet indict for a lesser offense requiring a higher culpable mental state? Reduced to the real terms of the instant case, can a Grand Jury no-bill a submission for the class E felony of criminally negligent homicide, which requires a culpable mental state of "criminal negligence”, and indict, upon the same conduct for the misdemeanor of reckless driving, which requires the higher…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. GroganNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Martinis v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. WaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. Badke, New York County Courts2008