Legal Opinion

People v. Ackroyd

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Harris, J.

The instant case presents the following paradox: how, upon the same conduct, can a Grand Jury legally absolve one for a higher offense requiring a lower culpable mental state, yet indict for a lesser offense requiring a higher culpable mental state? Reduced to the real terms of the instant case, can a Grand Jury no-bill a submission for the class E felony of criminally negligent homicide, which requires a culpable mental state of "criminal negligence”, and indict, upon the same conduct for the misdemeanor of reckless driving, which requires the higher…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. GroganNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Martinis v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. Badke, New York County Courts2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API