Legal Opinion

Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Successor in Interest to Pilgrim's Pride Corporation of Georgia f/k/a Gold Kist, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 11, 2013No. 12089-10Published

1Opinion of the Court

141 T.C. No. 17

UNITED STATES TAX COURT PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION OF GEORGIA f.k.a. GOLD KIST, INC. SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO GOLD KIST INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 12089-10. Filed December 11, 2013. P is the successor in interest to G. G was contractually obligated to purchase, and in 1999 did purchase, securities from S and T for $98.6 million. The securities were capital assets of G. In 2004 S offered to redeem the securities for $20 million. G’s board of directors decided…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Burnet v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API