Legal Opinion

State v. Gassman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2012No. 85801-2PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 A trial court must have authority to manage the parties and proceedings before it. The State argues the trial court in this case erroneously imposed sanctions in a criminal prosecution without explicitly finding bad faith. While a finding of bad faith is the preferred basis for imposing sanctions in a criminal case, we will uphold sanctions if we can infer bad faith from the record before us. However, the trial court in the present case did not make a finding of bad faith and, given concessions at oral argument, the record does not support sanctions. We therefore reverse.

Facts

¶2 The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cowles Publishing Company v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Eric Burt v. Washington State Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Maria Hedger v. Lisa Groeschell And John Doe GroeschellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. State v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. NumrichWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Dalton M, LLC v. N. Cascade Tr. Servs., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2023

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API