State v. Gassman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.
¶1 A trial court must have authority to manage the parties and proceedings before it. The State argues the trial court in this case erroneously imposed sanctions in a criminal prosecution without explicitly finding bad faith. While a finding of bad faith is the preferred basis for imposing sanctions in a criminal case, we will uphold sanctions if we can infer bad faith from the record before us. However, the trial court in the present case did not make a finding of bad faith and, given concessions at oral argument, the record does not support sanctions. We therefore reverse.
Facts
¶2 The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Cowles Publishing Company v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Eric Burt v. Washington State Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Maria Hedger v. Lisa Groeschell And John Doe GroeschellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. NumrichWashington Supreme Court · 2021
- Dalton M, LLC v. N. Cascade Tr. Servs., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.