Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kujas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1981No. 1361PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in failing to dismiss all of the charges against her pursuant to Pa.R. Crim.P. 1100. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of sentence and order appellant discharged.

In a written complaint filed on April 22, 1978, appellant was charged with, inter alia, two misdemeanors 1 and two summary traffic offenses. 2 On September 20, 1978, the Commonwealth obtained a one hundred eighty (180) day extension of time for commencement of trial pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(c). 3 On May 7, 1980, appellant filed a petition to dismiss the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. AntonuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. IancovettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Constantino v. Forest Hills BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Com. v. Boney, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Lucabaugh, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. Mills, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API