Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Capone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damage for injurious falsehood and wrongful interference with prospective economic advantage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered February 8, 1991, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and substituting therefor a provision denying the defendants’ motion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Gross v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Pauk v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Murphy v. HerfortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Golomb v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. LaDuke v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Hertzel v. Town of Putnam ValleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Velazquez v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Blum v. ValentineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Hertzel v. Town of Putnam ValleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API