Legal Opinion
Hertzel v. Town of Putnam Valley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 2, 2015No. 2012-08920ON MOTIONPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion by the respondent, inter alia, for leave to reargue stated portions of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, entered August 1, 2012, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated October 1, 2014.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
Ordered that the motion is granted to the extent that reargument is granted and, upon reargument, the decision and order of this Court dated October 1, 2014 (Hertzel v Town of Putnam Val., 121 AD3d 641 [2014]), is recalled and vacated, and the following…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gross v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Golomb v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Adams v. WelchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- California Suites, Inc. v. Russo Demolition Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Murphy v. CaponeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- T-Rex Hyde Park Owner, LLC v. Dutchess County LegislatureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Abelesz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Morton v. New York City Bd. of Educ. Retirement Sys.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024