Legal Opinion

Sosnowski v. Lenox

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 9, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.

The plaintiffs in these actions, tried together, were passengers in a car owned by the defendant Charles Fecto, Sr., which had been loaned to his son, the defendant Charles Fecto, Jr., and was being operated by Stanley Hromiko. The car collided with one belonging to the defendant Mrs. Thomas W. Lenox and operated by her husband, the defend ant Thomas W. Lenox. At the time of trial the plaintiffs moved to amend their complaints to make the administrator of the estate of Stanley Hromiko a party defendant. The motion was denied, a verdict was rendered for all defendants and the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guhring v. GumpperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Benson v. MoreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. Iannucci v. LambSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Buonanno v. CameronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  5. Svenberg v. SubotkouskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moe v. AlsopOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Reed v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
  3. DeDominicis v. Cornfield Point Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API