Nakano v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California; Edward E. Cushman, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against S. Nakano. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was convicted under an indictment which charged him with, keeping a house of ill fame within five miles of a military post, in violation of section 13 of the Act of May 18, 1917 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 2019b), and the order of the Secretary of War made in pursuance thereof.
[1] Error is assigned to the refusal of the court below to strike from the evidence the testimony of a policeman, who- testified that on the premises of the plaintiff in error he arrested a certain woman who he said was a prostitute; that she was soliciting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Beard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- State v. ToombsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- State v. LittmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- United States v. McAvoyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1860
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- George Harold Wiltsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- In Re WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959