Legal Opinion

Boykin v. Campbell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J. Leahy v. Dugdale, 27 Mo. 437 ; City v. Clemens, 42 Mo. 69 ; De Barry v. Withers, 44 Pa. St. 359 ; Smith v.Kennett, 18 Mo. 154; Edged v. Tucker, 40 Mo. 523; Walker v. Mauro, 18 Mo. 564 ; Long v. Constant, 19 Mo. 320. Lansden v. McCarthy, 45 Mo. 106 ; Hobson v. Drummond, 2 Barn. & Adol. 303 ; Stevens v. Berning, 1 Kay & J. 168.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

This cause was commenced before a justice. On trial anew in the Circuit Court, a jury was waived. Evidence was introduced to show that the defendants, on the 30th of May, 1879, bought of plaintiff fifty thousand pounds of bacon deliverable at seller’s option during July, 1879, at $5.52£ per hundred pounds. This contract was made subject to the rules of the Merchants’ Exchange. Under those rules, either party might call for margins as the market price varied. If the margins were not at once put up, the party *496entitled to demand the deposit might close the contract before July 31st, and demand a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lansden v. McCarthySupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. D. C. Hardy Implement Co. v. South Bend Iron WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. McDaniel v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Sprankle v. TruloveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Swarts v. Narragansett Electric Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1904
  5. Butts v. McMurryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API