Quinn v. State

The sole issue presented on this review is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s postconviction motions to withdraw his pleas of guilty.

This court frequently has been asked to review questions based on the alleged incompetency or inadequacy of counsel. The standard for determining whether adequate representation has been given an accused was stated in Pulaski v. State (1964), 23 Wis. 2d 138, 148, 126 N. W. 2d 625, as follows:

“. . . Often after trial, charges of incompetency are directed toward counsel because it appears other tactics than those chosen might have been more…