Commonwealth v. Shaleen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 26, Jan. T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Ct., Jan. T., 1905, No. 9, affirming judgment of Q. S. Lackawanna Co., Oct. T., 1904, No. 1,282, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. John Shaleen. Appeal from Superior Court. For the facts see the opinion of the Supreme Court and 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 1. Error assigned was the judgment of the Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Stewaet,
In affirming this judgment we would not be understood as adopting the interpretation placed on the act of assembly under which the case arises, by the court from which the appeal comes. That interpretation brings the act — so it is argued— in conflict with that provision of the federal constitution which guarantees equal privileges to the citizens of the several states. An interpretation which finds larger and better support in those features of the act which should determine the question, leaves *596it clear of any such objection as that urged, and avoids all…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Smith v. HiginbothomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Lurie v. Republican AllianceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Verona v. Schenley Farms Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Alford v. RaschiatoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.