Legal Opinion

American Life Ins. Co. v. Aladdin Temple Ben. Ass'n

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1939No. 6 Div. 526Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

FOSTER, Justice.

Appellant claims that we fell into error in holding that a recovery could be had of the amount paid under a void contract, because the alleged contract violated the statute against premium discrimination, invoking the well known principle that money cannot be recovered when paid under a void contract, if the contract is expressly prohibited by law or its execution is made a criminal offense.

The binder fixing the rate was made by an agent of appellent, which appellant claimed was without authority to bind it, and repudiated it as a contract.

We held that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bank & Loan Co. v. PetrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. DismukesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Morris Adler & Co. v. J. E. Jones & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Wright v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API