Legal Opinion

Chrysler Capital Corp. v. Century Power Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 17, 1991No. 91 Civ. 1937 (RPP)PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Defendants Century Power Corporation (“Century Power”) (previously known as “Alamito Company”), Catalyst Energy Corporation (“Catalyst”), Tucson Electric Power Company (“Tepco”) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (“San Diego G & E”) move jointly for a stay of discovery pending the Court’s decision on their outstanding motions to dismiss. Defendants also move for a protective order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) regarding the plaintiffs’ requests for production of documents.

The parties make essentially the same arguments as to a stay…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Transunion Corporation and Union Industries, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Ceres Partners v. Gel AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Hong Leong Finance Ltd. v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Johnson v. New York Univ. School of Educ.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  4. Williston v. EgglestonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Akhtar v. AggarwalaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API