State v. Pathod
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
The State of Nebraska filed an application for leave to docket an appeal under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2315.01 (Reissue 1995). The issue is whether a district court, when sentencing a defendant, must advise and provide written notification of the requirements of Nebraska’s Sex Offender Registration Act (the Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4001 et seq. (Cum. Supp. 2002). We determine that the court must provide written notification at sentencing. It also must provide copies of the notification and journal entry to various parties. But we also conclude that the failure to do so was harmless because the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Spaghetti Ltd. Partnership v. WolfeNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SchneiderNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Woodhouse Ford, Inc. v. LaflanNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Campbell v. City of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System Board of TrusteesNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. PangbornNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HenseNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. GriffinNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- McCray v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LaneNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.