Legal Opinion

Balsley v. THERMO POWER CORP.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 18, 2001No. Civ. 00-40268PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Thermo Power Corporation’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), this Court has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid in the disposition of this motion. For reasons set forth below, this Court grants Defendant’s motion.

Factual and Procedural Background

Defendant Thermo Power Corporation (“Thermo Power”) is a Massachusetts cor poration with its principal place of business in Massachusetts. Defendant does…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roche Diagnostics Corporation v. DicksteinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API