Balsley v. THERMO POWER CORP.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Thermo Power Corporation’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), this Court has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid in the disposition of this motion. For reasons set forth below, this Court grants Defendant’s motion.
Factual and Procedural Background
Defendant Thermo Power Corporation (“Thermo Power”) is a Massachusetts cor poration with its principal place of business in Massachusetts. Defendant does…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roche Diagnostics Corporation v. DicksteinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021