Legal Opinion

State v. Barner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 1992No. C2-92-71PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant state challenges the suppression of respondent’s confession. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Respondent, a 35-year-old man, was charged with attempted murder and attempted aggravated robbery. During the assault, the victim struggled with his attacker and, after suffering multiple stab wounds, succeeded in wresting the knife away before the attacker fled.

A confidential informant identified respondent as the person who had attacked and stabbed the victim. Respondent was arrested and read his Miranda rights. Respondent then discussed the incident with the arresting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. HardimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CrittCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. BarnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API