Manice v. THE HOWARD SAVINGS INSTITUTION
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
30 N.J. Super. 267 (1954)
104 A.2d 74
BARBARA BRADLEY MANICE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE HOWARD SAVINGS INSTITUTION, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided March 26, 1954.
Mr. Saul J. Zucker for the plaintiff (Messrs. Kristeller and Zucker, attorneys).
Mr. Corwin Howell for the defendant (Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Ward, attorneys).
FREUND, J.S.C.
The question for determination is whether the settlor may terminate an inter vivos "irrevocable" active trust agreement, which contains spendthrift trust provisions, on the ground that she has become the sole beneficiary.
On…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Attorney General v. Algonquin ClubMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Schellentrager v. Tradesmens National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Colvin v. PaineWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Long v. Tradesmens Natl. B. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. MargettsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harrison v. City National Bank of Clinton, IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1962
- Heifetz v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings AssociationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015