Legal Opinion

Sikorski v. Whorton

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 29, 2009No. 3:06-cv-00696-LRH (VPC.)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.

The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (# 91 1 ) entered on April 30, 2009, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (# 77) be denied and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 78) be granted as to all counts. No objections were filed. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. (PC) Drake v. McComasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. (PC) Drake v. McComasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. (PC) Penton v. HubardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Cobb v. MadlockDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  5. Hughbanks v. FlukeDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API