Legal Opinion
Moore v. JUDICIAL INQUIRY COM'N OF STATE
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 30, 2004No. 1030398PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
891 So.2d 848 (2004)
Roy S. MOORE
v.
JUDICIAL INQUIRY COMMISSION OF the STATE OF ALABAMA.
1030398.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
April 30, 2004.
Andrew D. Dill, Foundation for Moral Law, Inc., Montgomery; and Phillip L. Jauregui, Birmingham, for appellant.
William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen.; Rosa H. Davis, chief asst. atty. gen.; and Charles B. Campbell and Melissa K. Atwood, asst. attys. gen., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.[1]
Facts
The material facts are not disputed. Roy S. Moore was elected to the office of Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court in a statewide general election in November 2000. On January…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Bessemer v. McClainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Beckerle v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- An Inquiry Concerning the Honorable Ruth Neely, Municipal Court Judge and Circuit Court Magistrate, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Sublette County, WyomingJudge Ruth Neely v. Wyoming Commission On Judicial Conduct and Ethics.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Moore v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- Moore v. Alabama Judicial Inquiry CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.