Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Haynes
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 11, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 6278, 1 CA-CIV 6323 and 1 CA-CIV 6377PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Chief Judge.
In the case of Stokes v. Stokes, 143 Ariz. 590, 694 P.2d 1204 (1984), this court held that A.R.S. § 38-850(C), Arizona’s anti-alienation statute dealing with benefits payable under the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System, prohibited a trial court from imposing a trust in favor of a former spouse/creditor on the beneficiary’s interest in the retirement system. The present appeal questions whether that same statute precludes a trial court from awarding any community interest in the retirement system to the noncovered spouse of a beneficiary under the system.
The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Phillipson v. Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Koelsch v. KoelschArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Parada v. ParadaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Snyder v. Tucson Police Public Safety Personnel Retirement System BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Snyder v. Tucson Police Public Safety Personnel Retirement System BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Parada v. ParadaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.