Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Holcomb

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1983No. 10989PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaird, J.

After being injured in a collision with an uninsured motorist, defendant, Tammy Holcomb, brought a claim against plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, under the uninsured motorist provision of the policy she had with plaintiff. After the claim was submitted to arbitration, a substantial award was made to defendant for her injuries. Less than three months after such award, plaintiff instituted the present litigation, seeking a declaratory judgment that the policy was no longer in effect, due to the non-cooperation of the policyholder.

Shortly after the complaint was filed,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CochraneOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Luntz v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Western Casualty & Surety Company v. Foley BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gabor v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
  3. Ward v. Custom Glass & Frame, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Templin v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. American Employers Insurance v. Metro Regional Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API