Legal Opinion

Charles T. Coleman, Sr. v. Dave Faulkner, Sheriff Tulsa County, Robert Duckert, Captain Tulsa County Jail, Sheriff's Department

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 8, 1982No. 80-2073PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from an order of the federal district court dismissing Charles Coleman’s section 1983 1 action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Mr. Coleman alleged that the Sheriff of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, and his deputy had deprived…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Hodgson v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Durre v. DempseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Russell E. Freeman v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Begg v. MoffittDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Wolfenbarger v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Gendalia v. GioffreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API