Legal Opinion
Smith v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1965No. 10361PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AYRES, Judge.
By this action in tort instituted by Thurman E. Smith and Home Indemnity Company, workmen’s compensation insurer of Smith’s employer, against the Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company, the public liability insurer of a Ford automobile of one Ralph C. Norton, plaintiff Smith seeks to recover damages for personal injuries, and plaintiff Plome Indemnity Company, reimbursement of compensation and medical expenses paid as a result of an accident on February 1, 1964, wherein plaintiff Smith lost the distal phalanx of his right middle finger.
No controversy exists as to the manner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATIONLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Weadock v. Eagle Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Prescott v. Central Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Wall v. WindmannLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Panama R. v. BeckfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Graham v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Ellis v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- In Re Air Crash Disaster at New Orleans, Etc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1975
- Shepherd v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,266 Andrew Hovanec, Liberty Mutual Insurance, Intervenor-Appellee v. Harnischfeger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.