Legal Opinion

Heidt v. Argani

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 2009No. DA 08-0626PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH

¶1 Amy Heidt, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of her husband Gerard Heidt, brought a medical malpractice action against Dr. Faranak Argani and her employer Deaconess Billings Clinic. The jury returned a verdict for Argani and the Clinic, and Heidt appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 Heidt presents the following issues for review:

¶3 Issue One: Whether the District Court should have granted Heidt’s motion for a mistrial after a juror became ill during closing arguments and was attended to by Dr. Argani.

¶4 Issue Two: Whether the District Court should have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harding v. DeissMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Brandon v. KarpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Campbell v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Reome v. Cortland Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Ratcliff v. MurphyMontana Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mary E. Jack, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of Ella Jack and Owen Jack and Lawrence Laird Jack III, Individually v. Jennifer R. BoothSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. State v. ZlahnMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Harrell v. Farmers Educational Cooperative UnionMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Schindler v. United Services Automobile Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. RevelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API