Legal Opinion

United States v. Watson

United States Circuit Court

Decided July 7, 1883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Motion to Quash Information.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The questions now for decision arise upon defendants’ motion to quash the information against them. The information in substance states and charges as follows: That an election was held in the second congressional district of this state, on the seventh day of November, 1882, for a representative for said district in the forty-eighth congress of the United States; that the defendants conspired, confederated, and agreed together to procure from the governor, lieutenant governor, and secretary of state of this state the appointment of one Dunlap as one of the commissioners of election for…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rumely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. United States v. Robert S. Falcone, Sandra S. FalconeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. De Lacey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  4. Ex parte BlackDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1906
  5. State v. TinklerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API