Legal Opinion

Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1993No. 65 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

534 Pa. 97 (1993)

626 A.2d 537

Jeffrey BLUM, a minor, by his parents and natural guardians, Joan and Fred BLUM, and Joan and Fred Blum, in their own right, Appellants,

v.

MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and Rite-Aid Pharmacy, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 22, 1992.

Decided June 3, 1993.

Thomas R. Kline, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Andrew Rogoff, Joseph E. Conley, Jr. (pro hac vice), Edward W. Madeira, Philadelphia, for appellees.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

Appellants, Jeffrey Blum, a minor, by his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API