Legal Opinion

Schroepfer v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 31, 1942No. 33,299PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Certiorari to review a decision awarding the employe workmen’s compensation for the loss of an eye.

The employer operated a farm near Comfrey on which he lived. He was engaged both in farming and building contracting. The building contracting business consisted mainly of constructing buildings for farmers in the vicinity.

The employe, who was raised on a farm, had worked as a carpenter’s helper. On March 12, 1941, he commenced work for the employer. During the first week he did carpentry work building chicken brooders at Sleepy Eye. Then he was engaged picking corn for a week.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Greischar v. St. Mary's CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Hill v. UmbehockerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Hebranson v. Fairmont CreamerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Partridge v. BlackbirdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Blew v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Tucker v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Davis v. McKinneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Nelson v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API