Sportmart, Inc. v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff Sportmart, Inc., brought this declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that defendants, Continental Casualty and Continental’s insured, Daisy Manufacturing, were required to defend and indemnify Sportmart in a personal injury suit involving a Daisy product. Following cross-summary judgment motions, the trial court granted judgment for defendants. On appeal, plaintiff raises the following issues: (1) whether the court erred in determining that Continental had no duty to defend plaintiff; and (2) whether…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Murphy v. UrsoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Conway v. Country Casualty Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Schal Bovis, Inc. v. Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- American Country Insurance v. James McHugh Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- L.A. Connection v. Penn-America Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Whitehall Convalescent and Nursing Home, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Salerno v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.