Legal Opinion

Sportmart, Inc. v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 15, 1994No. 1-93-2660PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff Sportmart, Inc., brought this declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that defendants, Continental Casualty and Continental’s insured, Daisy Manufacturing, were required to defend and indemnify Sportmart in a personal injury suit involving a Daisy product. Following cross-summary judgment motions, the trial court granted judgment for defendants. On appeal, plaintiff raises the following issues: (1) whether the court erred in determining that Continental had no duty to defend plaintiff; and (2) whether…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Murphy v. UrsoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Conway v. Country Casualty Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Schal Bovis, Inc. v. Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. American Country Insurance v. James McHugh Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. L.A. Connection v. Penn-America Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Whitehall Convalescent and Nursing Home, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Salerno v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API