Gray v. Seidel
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The plaintiffs, James and Barbara Gray, appeal a decision of the Superior Court (Barry, J.) affirming the Town of Meredith Zoning Board of Adjustment’s (board) denial of their request for a variance, and denying their petition for declaratory judgment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse and remand.
In 1985, the plaintiffs purchased property in Meredith, including an easement over the property of defendants Gerald and Margaret Seidel for access to Lake Winnepesaukee and dock use. The easement is a ten-foot strip of land along the southwesterly boundary of the Seidels’ property.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Dumont v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Radkay v. ConfaloneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- New England Brickmaster, Inc. v. Town of SalemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Olszak v. Town of New HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cook v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Appeal of Robert C. Michele & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Brandt Development Co. v. City of SomersworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Gordon v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Lakeside Lodge, Inc. v. Town of New LondonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.