Legal Opinion

King v. Keystone-Fleming Transport, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1957No. 6653PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Justice.

Under the record in this case we believe the statement made by the appellee as to the nature and result of this suit is correct and we adopt the same as a correct statement, which is as follows:

“This appeal is from a judgment rendered on an instructed verdict given in Cause No. 25798 in the 72nd District Court of Lubbock County, Texas, Honorable Robert H. Bean of the 140th District Court presiding under Rule 330 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The cause below was a suit for exemplary damages, brought by the surviving wife and children of Earl Cecil Collier, who died…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. King v. McGuffTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Morton Salt Co. v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donnel v. Lara, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  2. Ghazali v. Southland Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  3. Sheffield Division Armco Steel Corporation v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API