Legal Opinion

Mott v. Wright

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1919No. Civ. No. 2007Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion

Appellants have filed a petition for rehearing in which several points are raised. [9] The first one is, that the contract in question was an entire and not a divisible one. The contract was made by Wright, the owner, with Williams, the contractor, and provided for the erection of a six-flat building upon a lot at Eleventh and O Streets, in the city of Sacramento, for the consideration of nine thousand five hundred dollars. Said contract also contained the following provision:

"It is hereby agreed that in consideration of receiving the above contract, the party of second part will furnish…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hibernia Sav. and Loan Soc. v. FarnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Buena Vista Oil Co. v. Park Bk. of L. A.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Flores v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Camp v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API