Mott v. Wright
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion
Appellants have filed a petition for rehearing in which several points are raised. [9] The first one is, that the contract in question was an entire and not a divisible one. The contract was made by Wright, the owner, with Williams, the contractor, and provided for the erection of a six-flat building upon a lot at Eleventh and O Streets, in the city of Sacramento, for the consideration of nine thousand five hundred dollars. Said contract also contained the following provision:
"It is hereby agreed that in consideration of receiving the above contract, the party of second part will furnish…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hibernia Sav. and Loan Soc. v. FarnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Buena Vista Oil Co. v. Park Bk. of L. A.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Flores v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Camp v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919