Legal Opinion

International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 2, 1979No. Nos. 78-2066, 78-2067, 78-2261 and 78-2262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III.

Circuit Judge TAMM dissents.

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated cases concern the obligation of employers to supply unions during collective bargaining with information on employment of minorities and women. The International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO — CLC, was the charging party in two unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board in which Westinghouse Electric Company1 and East Dayton Tool & Die Company 2 were found to have violated…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Medical Committee for Human RightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, East Dayton Tool and Die Company, Intervenor. International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, Westinghouse Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. The East Dayton Tool and Die Co., International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc, and I.U.E. Local 668, Intervenors. National Labor Relations Board v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API