First National Bank v. Strait
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant, as administrator of the estate of Horace B. Strait, deceased, from an order of the district court for Scott county, Cadwell, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $8,875. Affirmed. The inventories mentioned in the opinion were introduced in evidence to show that the firm note, after execution by How of the renewal notes, was included therein and continued to be treated by the bank as an asset.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This case has already been twice before this court, first in 65 Minn. 162, 67 N. W. 987, where a verdict for the plaintiff was set aside because of error, in admitting incompetent evidence, and again in 71 Minn. 69, 73 N. W. 645, where a verdict for the defendant was set aside because of the admission of evidence which was inadmissible under the pleadings. A third trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff, and this appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was not justified by the evidence, and of errors of law occurring on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First National Bank v. StraitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- First National Bank v. StraitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mitchell v. MortenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Lundquist v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Park v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Brusletten v. RelyeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940