Legal Opinion
Risser & Reitz v. Martin & Phillips
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided October 17, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Mahaslta District Court. — Hon. D. Ryan, Judge. The district court sustained a motion of the plaintiffs for a judgment nunc pro tune against John N. Martin. From the order sustaining the motion, and from the judgment rendered thereon, he appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.
On the tenth day of July, 1880, the appellant executed a statement for a judgment by confession, of which the parts material to a determination of this appeal are as follows:
“In the circuit court of Mahaska county. Eisser & Eeitz v. Martin & Phillips. Confession of judgment. I, J. N. Martin, being duly sworn, depose and say that I am a member of the copartnership of Martin & Phillips, and that said firm are justly indebted to the plaintiffs, Eisser & Eeitz, in the sum of three hundred and forty-three and twenty-one hundredths dollars, which •indebtedness arose from the following account of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fuller & Co. v. StebbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Giddings v. GiddingsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- Doughty v. MeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Fred Miller Brewing Co. v. Capital InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Trotti v. KinnearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- State Savings Bank v. RatcliffeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- McConnell v. AveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.