Legal Opinion

Jaguar Credit Corp. v. Colleran

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 22, 1995No. 941664Published

1Opinion of the CourtSpurlock, J.

Before the court are motions for summary judgment on behalf of each parly,1 as well as a motion to strike portions of an affidavit appended to the defendant’s summary judgment submissions. For the following reasons, the motion to strike is denied, the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is allowed, and the motions for summary judgment of the defendant and the third party defendant are denied.

Background

The following facts are not disputed. On August 30, 1991, defendant Neil F. Colleran (Colleran) signed an agreement with Jaguar Leasing Corporation (Jaguar)2 to lease a 1991 Jaguar…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Correllas v. ViveirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Freelander v. G. & K. REALTY CORP.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Noyes v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API