Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. City and County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 20, 1971No. 24769PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

This is an appeal by defendant-appellant City and County of Denver, hereinafter referred to as the City, from an adverse judgment of the trial court, declaring article 116(c) of the Denver Municipal Code (the Employee’s Occupational Privilege Tax) to be invalid when applied to plaintiff-appellees and other members of those classes represented by them.

Plaintiffs Gill and Taylor represented in this class action the members of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado. The other plaintiff-appellees represent as a class employees of the state in the classified service, more commonly known as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Helvering v. GerhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Horrell v. Department of AdministrationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Collopy v. Wildlife Commission, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Kuhn v. State Dept. of Revenue of State of Colo.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. McPheeter v. City of AuburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API