Hill v. New
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLSON. J.,
The plaiuiiff in error instituted this action against the defendants in error to recover damages in the sum of ¥510 because of the failure of (be conductor in charge of one of the defendants’ trains to awaken plaintiff at Dustin in time for him to board a train of the Ft. Smith & Western Railway Company to Oklahoma City.
The facts upon which plaintiff relies for a recovery, briefly stated, are that on Iba 29th day of November, 1916, he purchased n railroad ticket of defendants’ agent at Hichita,- a- station on defendants' railroad, which ticket entitled him lo transportation from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ApplewhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Nunn v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Roberts v. BarnesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightcapIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927