Legal Opinion

Hill v. New

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1923No. 10893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLSON. J.,

The plaiuiiff in error instituted this action against the defendants in error to recover damages in the sum of ¥510 because of the failure of (be conductor in charge of one of the defendants’ trains to awaken plaintiff at Dustin in time for him to board a train of the Ft. Smith & Western Railway Company to Oklahoma City.

The facts upon which plaintiff relies for a recovery, briefly stated, are that on Iba 29th day of November, 1916, he purchased n railroad ticket of defendants’ agent at Hichita,- a- station on defendants' railroad, which ticket entitled him lo transportation from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ApplewhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Nunn v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Roberts v. BarnesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightcapIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API