Legal Opinion

Roy Investment Co. v. Holmes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1930No. 22547. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This action was originally begun by Boy Investment Co., a corporation, on an assigned claim for $3,082 from appellants to it, against respondents in this action. Appellants were brought in as additional defendants, and the assigned claim was reassigned to appellants, and upon the cross-complaint of respondents Holmes, the answer and cross-complaint of appellants and the reply thereto, the cause was tried in the lower court without a jury.

The litigation grew out of the construction of a house by appellants in the Broadmoor Addition to Seattle, there being no contract in writing entered into…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Broadway Hospital & Sanitarium v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. O'Connor v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Anderson v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Logan v. ShelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Great Western Investment Co. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Estate of LunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Logan v. ShelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API