Legal Opinion

In Re Wigenton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 3, 2012No. D-131 September Term 2010, 068659Published

1Opinion of the Court

40 A.3d 723 (2012)

210 N.J. 95

In the Matter of Kevin P. WIGENTON, an Attorney at Law.

D-131 September Term 2010, 068659

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 30, 2011.

Decided April 3, 2012.

Maureen G. Bauman, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Shalom D. Stone argued the cause for respondent (Walder, Hayden & Brogan, attorneys; Mr. Stone and Justin P. Walder, Roseland, on the brief).

2Per curiam

This disciplinary matter was commenced by a 2006 complaint filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) charging respondent, Kevin P. Wigenton of Red Bank, who was…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re RosenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. In Re MirabelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Matter of JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API